Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates a complex grasp of the challenges the organization faced as a result of the event or incident
Describes the specific challenges the event or incident presented to the organization
Describes specific challenges the event or incident presented the organization, but description is cursory or contains inaccuracies
Does not describe specific challenges the event or incident presented the organization
3.82
Societal Perception: Values and Purpose
Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates an insightful awareness of the influence the organization brings to the surrounding society
Explains how the surrounding society values the sport organization and views its purpose
Explains how the surrounding society values the sport organization and views its purpose, but explanation is cursory or contains inaccuracies
Does not explain how the surrounding society values the sport organization and views its purpose
4.77
Societal Perception: Reinforces Cultural
Norms
Meets “Proficient” criteria and makes cogent connections between the event or incident and stereotypes or cultural norms the organization has perpetuated
Determines how the event or incident reinforced stereotypes or cultural norms the organization has perpetuated
Determines how the event or incident reinforced stereotypes or cultural norms, but stereotypes and norms were not perpetuated by the organization, or determination is cursory or illogical
Does not determine how the event or incident reinforced stereotypes or cultural norms
4.77
Impact: Economic Impact
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and examples provided demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the organization’s economic impact
Evaluates the economic impact the selected sport organization has had on the surrounding society, supporting response with examples
Evaluates the economic impact the selected sport organization has had on the surrounding society, but evaluation is cursory or contains inaccuracies or is not supported with examples
Does not evaluate the economic impact the selected sport organization has had on the surrounding society
3.82
Impact: Factors
Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates a complex grasp of the economic impact of the event or incident
Describes the different factors that determined the economic impact of the event or incident
Describes the different factors that determined the economic impact of the event or incident, but description is cursory or contains inaccuracies
Does not describe the different factors that determined the economic impact of the event or incident
3.82
Impact: Sociocultural Impact
Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates a complex grasp of the sociocultural impact of the event or incident
Describes the different factors that determined the sociocultural impact of the event or incident
Describes the different factors that determined the sociocultural impact of the event or incident, but description is cursory or contains inaccuracies
Does not describe the different factors that determined the sociocultural impact of the event or incident
3.82
Impact: Following the Event
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and summary illustrates a sophisticated explanation of the changes that impacted the surrounding society
Summarizes the changes the organization has made following the event or incident that have impacted society
Summarizes the changes the organization has made following the event or incident, but summary is cursory or contains inaccuracies or changes have not impacted society
Does not summarize the changes the organization has made following the event or incident
4.77
Impact: Public Policy and the Law
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and summary demonstrates a complex grasp of the roles public policy and law play within the organization
Summarizes the roles public policy and the law play within the sport organization and the selected event
Summarizes the roles public policy and the law play within the sport organization and the selected event, but summary is cursory or contains inaccuracies
Does not summarize the roles public policy and the law play within the sport organization and the selected event
6.36
Impact: Cultural and Political Change
Meets “Proficient” criteria and makes cogent connections between the event or incident and the resulting cultural and political changes
Analyzes the impact of the organization in bringing about cultural and political change as a result of the event or incident
Analyzes the impact of the organization in bringing about cultural and political change, but analysis is cursory or contains inaccuracies
Does not analyze the impact of the organization in bringing about cultural and political change as a result of the event or incident
6.36
Impact: Positive and Negative Effects
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and examples demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the surrounding society’s reaction to the event or incident
Analyzes the surrounding society’s response to the positive and negative effects of the event or incident and includes specific examples to illustrate response
Analyzes the surrounding society’s response to the positive and negative effects of the event or incident, but analysis is cursory or illogical or examples do not effectively illustrate response
Does not analyze the surrounding society’s response to the positive and negative effects of the event or incident
4.77
Impact: Perception Changed
Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates an insightful awareness concerning the surrounding society’s change in perception of the organization
Describes how the surrounding society’s perception of the organization changed as a result of the event or incident
