Describes how the surrounding society’s perception of the organization changed as a result of the event or incident, but description is cursory or contains inaccuracies
Does not describe how the surrounding society’s perception of the organization changed as a result of the event or incident
4.77
Organization’s Response: Societal
Pressure
Meets “Proficient” criteria and makes cogent connections between societal pressure and expectations and the organization’s response
Explains how the sport organization responded to societal pressure and expectations of the surrounding society related to the event or incident
Explains how the sport organization responded to societal pressure and expectations of the surrounding society related to the event or incident, but explanation is cursory or contains inaccuracies
Does not explain how the sport organization responded to societal pressure and expectations of the surrounding society related to the event or incident
4.77
Organization’s Response: Response
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and evidence provided demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of the effectiveness of the response
Evaluates the effectiveness of the sport organization’s response to the event or incident and provides evidence to support response
Evaluates the effectiveness of the sport organization’s response to the event or incident, but evaluation is cursory, contains inaccuracies or is not supported with evidence
Does not evaluate the effectiveness of the sport organization’s response to the event or incident
4.77
Organization’s Response: Laws and/or Policies
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and examples provided demonstrate a complex grasp of the legal or policy aspects behind resolving the event or incident
Determines the specific laws and/or policies that impacted how the sport organization approached resolving the selected event or incident, supporting response with specific examples
Determines the specific laws and/or policies that impacted how the sport organization approached resolving the selected event or incident, but determinations contain inaccuracies or response is not supported with specific examples
Does not determine the specific laws and/or policies that impacted how the sport organization approached resolving the selected event or incident
6.36
Organization’s Response:
Recommendations
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and recommendations for internal preparation are well-supported and feasible
Formulates recommendations for how the sport organization can prepare itself internally to avoid future incidents or for when society shifts its expectations of the organization
Formulates recommendations for how the sport organization can prepare itself internally to avoid future incidents or for when society shifts its expectations of the organization, but recommendations are cursory or illogical
Does not formulate recommendations for how the sport organization can prepare itself internally to avoid future incidents or for when society shifts its expectations of the organization
4.77
Press Release: Overview
Meets “Proficient” criteria and overview demonstrates a nuanced understanding of how to appropriately describe the incident
Provides a brief overview of the incident, stating only the necessary and appropriate facts to release to the public
Provides a brief overview of the incident, but it contains excessive information or inappropriate facts
Does not provide a brief overview of the actions leading up to the event or incident
6.36
Press Release: Response Addressed
Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates an insightful awareness of how the incident was addressed by management
Describes the response to the event or incident and how it was addressed by management
Describes the response to the event or incident and how it was addressed by management, but description is cursory or contains inaccuracies
Does not describe the response to the event or incident and how it was addressed by management
6.36
Press Release: Future Events or Incidents
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and plans for addressing future events or incidents are well- supported and feasible
Explains how future events or incidents can and will be addressed based on the organization’s response to the situation
Explains how future events or incidents can and will addressed, but explanation is cursory or contain inaccuracies or is not based on the organization’s response to the situation
Does not explain how future events or incidents can and will be addressed
6.36
Articulation of Response
Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
4.58
Total 100%
