Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: EDSD_7900_Module4_Assignment_Rubric
| Unacceptable Graduate-Level Work | Minimal Graduate-Level Work | Advanced Graduate-Level Work | Exemplary Advanced Graduate-Level Work | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adherence to Assignment The extent to which work meets the assigned criteria. | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 8.4 (26.25%) Does not fulfill the expectations of the assignment. Key components are not included. Assignment lacks breadth and depth. Assignment demonstrates no understanding of course/module criteria. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 8.4 (26.25%) – 9.6 (30%) Most parts of assignment are completed. Topics are not fully developed. Assignment demonstrates minimal depth and breadth. Assignment demonstrates little understanding of course/module criteria. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 9.6 (30%) – 10.8 (33.75%) All parts of the assignment are completed, with fully developed topics. Assignment demonstrates appropriate breadth and depth. Assignment demonstrates clear understanding of course/module criteria. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 10.8 (33.75%) – 12 (37.5%) Assignment exceeds expectations, integrating additional material and/or information. Assignment demonstrates exceptional breadth and depth. Assignment demonstrates exceptional understanding of course/module criteria. Feedback: |
| Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas The extent to which course content is synthesized and supported with information from the Learning Resources and examples. | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 8.4 (26.25%) Shows a lack of understanding of the assignment’s purpose. Does not apply theories, concepts, and/or strategies. Does not include specific information from course videos or required readings. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 8.4 (26.25%) – 9.6 (30%) Demonstrates minimal depth and breadth. Generally applies theories, concepts, and/or strategies correctly, with ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped. Minimally includes specific information from course videos or required readings. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 9.6 (30%) – 10.8 (33.75%) Demonstrates a clear understanding of the assignment’s purpose. Provides careful consideration of key instructional concepts, theories, and strategies. Includes specific information from course videos or required readings to support major points. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 10.8 (33.75%) – 12 (37.5%) Demonstrates a clear understanding of the assignment’s purpose as well as the ability intellectually to explore and implement key instructional concepts. Demonstrates insightful critical thinking of key instructional concepts, theories, and strategies. Demonstrates exceptional inclusion of major points, using creditable sources, in addition to course videos or required readings. Feedback: |
| Expression and Formatting The extent to which scholarly, critical, analytical writing is presented in APA format. | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 5.6 (17.5%) The quality of writing and/or APA formatting are not acceptable for advanced graduate-level work; no effort to express ideas clearly and concisely. Major points do not reflect appropriate elements of communication, with many grammatical or mechanical errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 5.6 (17.5%) – 6.4 (20%) Somewhat represents scholarly, advanced graduate-level writing, with APA generally followed; elements of effective communication such as an introduction and conclusion are not included. Ideas are not clearly and concisely expressed, with more than a few grammatical or mechanical errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 6.4 (20%) – 7.2 (22.5%) Work is well organized with mostly correct APA formatting throughout; elements of effective communication such as an introduction and conclusion are included. Ideas are clearly and concisely expressed with few, if any, grammatical or mechanical errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 7.2 (22.5%) – 8 (25%) Work represents scholarly writing in correct APA format; effective sentence variety; and clear, concise, powerful expression. The entire piece is well organized and includes an introduction and conclusion. Work is unified around a central purpose with well-developed ideas, logically organized in paragraph structure with clear transitions and proper grammar. Feedback: |
Show Descriptions Show Feedback
Adherence to Assignment The extent to which work meets the assigned criteria.–
Levels of Achievement: Unacceptable Graduate-Level Work 0 (0%) – 8.4 (26.25%) Does not fulfill the expectations of the assignment. Key components are not included. Assignment lacks breadth and depth. Assignment demonstrates no understanding of course/module criteria. Minimal Graduate-Level Work 8.4 (26.25%) – 9.6 (30%) Most parts of assignment are completed. Topics are not fully developed. Assignment demonstrates minimal depth and breadth. Assignment demonstrates little understanding of course/module criteria. Advanced Graduate-Level Work 9.6 (30%) – 10.8 (33.75%) All parts of the assignment are completed, with fully developed topics. Assignment demonstrates appropriate breadth and depth. Assignment demonstrates clear understanding of course/module criteria. Exemplary Advanced Graduate-Level Work 10.8 (33.75%) – 12 (37.5%) Assignment exceeds expectations, integrating additional material and/or information. Assignment demonstrates exceptional breadth and depth. Assignment demonstrates exceptional understanding of course/module criteria. Feedback:
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas The extent to which course content is synthesized and supported with information from the Learning Resources and examples.–
Levels of Achievement: Unacceptable Graduate-Level Work 0 (0%) – 8.4 (26.25%) Shows a lack of understanding of the assignment’s purpose. Does not apply theories, concepts, and/or strategies. Does not include specific information from course videos or required readings. Minimal Graduate-Level Work 8.4 (26.25%) – 9.6 (30%) Demonstrates minimal depth and breadth. Generally applies theories, concepts, and/or strategies correctly, with ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped. Minimally includes specific information from course videos or required readings. Advanced Graduate-Level Work 9.6 (30%) – 10.8 (33.75%) Demonstrates a clear understanding of the assignment’s purpose. Provides careful consideration of key instructional concepts, theories, and strategies. Includes specific information from course videos or required readings to support major points. Exemplary Advanced Graduate-Level Work 10.8 (33.75%) – 12 (37.5%) Demonstrates a clear understanding of the assignment’s purpose as well as the ability intellectually to explore and implement key instructional concepts. Demonstrates insightful critical thinking of key instructional concepts, theories, and strategies. Demonstrates exceptional inclusion of major points, using creditable sources, in addition to course videos or required readings. Feedback:
