+1 (208) 254-6996 [email protected]
  

In Week 1, you used the scientific method to design research studies (basic and applied). Now you will select one of them (either the basic or the applied one) and build upon it using the skills you have developed since then. You are going to write the ‘introduction and background’ and the ‘method’ section of your study. Make sure that you review peer reviewed articles so that you can model your sections after those in peer reviewed journal articles. The background section of your study should be supported by at least 10 peer reviewed journal articles. Be sure to also specify your experimental and null hypothesis. In the method section, you will need to identify the methods of data collection, the participants, and the procedure for your study.  

At the conclusion of these two sections you need to write a rationale for your study that includes the following:

  • Analyze the types of sources used and how these choices may affect results.
  • Justify why your chosen methods of data collection are the optimal choice.
  • Discuss what type of approach you chose (e.g. qualitative, quantitative, or both) and evaluate why you chose this approach.

Submission Details

  • Please provide your answers in a 3- to 4-page Microsoft Word document.
  • Support your responses with examples.
  • Cite any sources in APA format.

11/4/21, 9:16 PM Rubric Assessment – PSY2060-Research Methods SU01 – South University

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Scientific Methods
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=82590&evalObjectId=420898&evalObjectType… 1/5

PSY2060 Week 5 Project Rubric Course: PSY2060-Research Methods SU01

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (81-93) 93 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (95- 107) 107 points

Proficient (B Range) (108- 120) 120 points

Exemplary (A Range) (122- 135) 135 points

Criterion Score

Fulfillment

of

Assignment

Expectation

s

/ 135 Student did

not submit

assignment.

Submission

does not meet

assignment

expectations.

It does not

address all

parts of the

assignment.

Submission

relies on

unsupported

claims (e.g.,

personal

conjecture,

judging

assertions

without

backing

evidence).

Submission

includes

excessive use

of direct

quotations.

Submission

does not

clearly

demonstrate

critical

thinking,

synthesis of

information, or

application of

research and

course

material.

Submission

meets most

assignment

expectations.

It addresses all

parts of the

assignment,

though some

parts may be

more fully

developed

than others.

While

submission

may include

some

unsupported

claims (e.g.,

personal

conjecture,

judging

assertions),

there are also

informed and

validated

conclusions

throughout,

supported

with cited

evidence.

Submission

may have a

few direct

quotations.

However,

there is at

least an

Submission

meets all

assignment

expectations

and addresses

all parts of the

assignment.

Submission

includes

almost no

unsupported

claims (e.g.,

personal

conjecture,

judging

assertions);

rather, most of

the submission

has informed

and validated

conclusions

supported

with cited

evidence.

Submission

has no direct

quotations, or

a couple of

quotes may be

used, but they

are explained

and analyzed

in detail to

demonstrate

understanding

of the content.

The required

Submission

meets all

assignment

expectations

and addresses

all parts of the

assignment.

Submission

includes no

unsupported

claims (e.g.,

personal

conjecture,

judging

assertions).

Rather, the

submission

has informed

and validated

conclusions

that

demonstrate

both breadth

and depth of

information

and are

supported by

evidence from

cited sources.

Submission is

completely

original to the

writer, yet

gives credit to

material that

informed the

student on the

11/4/21, 9:16 PM Rubric Assessment – PSY2060-Research Methods SU01 – South University

https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=82590&evalObjectId=420898&evalObjectType… 2/5

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (81-93) 93 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (95- 107) 107 points

Proficient (B Range) (108- 120) 120 points

Exemplary (A Range) (122- 135) 135 points

Criterion Score

attempt at

explaining and

analyzing the

direct

quotations.

The required

number and

types of

supporting

resources may

or may not be

included.

Resources may

not be

appropriate

(such as non-

scholarly

sources).

Submission

demonstrates

some

concerted

effort at

critical

thinking,

synthesis of

information, or

application of

research and

course

material.

number and

types of

supporting

resources are

utilized.

Most of the

submission

demonstrates

concerted

effort at

critical

thinking,

synthesis of

information,

and

application of

research and

course

material.

issue. The

submission

demonstrates

critical

thinking,

synthesis of

information,

and

application of

research and

course

material

through

inclusion of

support from

multiple

scholarly

sources in

addition to the

minimum

required for

the

assignment.

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (15-17) 17 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (18-20) 20 points

Proficient (B Range) (20-22) 22 points

Exemplary (A Range) (23-25) 25 points

Criterion Score

11/4/21, 9:16 PM Rubric Assessment – PSY2060-Research Methods SU01 – South University

https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=82590&evalObjectId=420898&evalObjectType… 3/5

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (15-17) 17 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (18-20) 20 points

Proficient (B Range) (20-22) 22 points

Exemplary (A Range) (23-25) 25 points

Criterion Score

Writing

Style and

Conventions

/ 25 Student did

not submit

assignment.

Writing errors

(spelling,

grammar, and

structure) are

so pervasive

through the

submission

that

readability and

understanding

are often

impeded.

Writing

conventions

are not readily

identifiable.

Submission

has several

writing issues

that, at times,

impede

readability and

understanding

of the writer’s

overall intent.

Writing

conventions

are not well-

developed or

consistently

utilized. Thus,

ideas are

generally

incoherently

or

inconsistently

presented.

Submission

has few

writing errors.

These errors

do not impede

readability or

understanding

of the writer’s

overall intent.

A thesis is

stated; topic

sentences and

transitions are

used

throughout

most of the

paper.

Submission

has no notable

major or minor

writing issues.

Sentences

flow together

and reflect

accurate

sentence

structure and

word choice.

Writing

conventions

(i.e., thesis

statement,

topic

sentences, and

transitions) are

accurately

utilized

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (15-17) 17 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (18-20) 20 points

Proficient (B Range) (20-22) 22 points

Exemplary (A Range) (23-25) 25 points

Criterion Score

11/4/21, 9:16 PM Rubric Assessment – PSY2060-Research Methods SU01 – South University

https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=82590&evalObjectId=420898&evalObjectType… 4/5

Total / 185

Criteria No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F through D Range) (15-17) 17 points

Satisfactory (C Range) (18-20) 20 points

Proficient (B Range) (20-22) 22 points

Exemplary (A Range) (23-25) 25 points

Criterion Score

APA

formatting

for

structure,

citations,

and

reference

list

/ 25 Student did

not submit

assignment.

There may be

no attempt at

APA

formatting

(e.g., no

citations

and/or

reference list).

If a reference

list is included,

it does not use

APA

formatting. In-

text citations

are missing or

improperly

formatted.

Required

elements are

missing, such

as a title page

or abstract

(when

required).

While APA

formatting is

attempted,

there are

many errors.

There may be

some missing

citations,

incorrectly

formatted

citations,

disagreement

between

citations and

references,

and/or errors

on the

reference list,

though it is

apparent that

the student

attempted

APA

formatting.

Title page

and/or

abstract (when

required) may

not be

properly

formatted.

There are only

a few minor

formatting

errors in

citations or

the reference

list. Title page

and abstract

(where

required) are

included and

properly

formatted.

Headings,

when used,

are properly

formatted,

though there

may be minor

errors in levels

used.

APA

formatting is

accurate

throughout

the paper,

including the

title page,

abstract (when

required), and

the reference

list. Headings

are included

when

appropriate,

using the

proper levels,

and properly

formatted.

11/4/21, 9:16 PM Rubric Assessment – PSY2060-Research Methods SU01 – South University

https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=82590&evalObjectId=420898&evalObjectType… 5/5

Overall Score

No

Submission 0 points

minimum

Emerging (F through D

Range) 127 points minimum

Satisfactory (C

Range) 147 points

minimum

Proficient (B

Range) 164 points

minimum

Exemplary (A

Range) 185 points

minimum

Order your essay today and save 10% with the discount code ESSAYHELP