follow advanced part of grading rubic
Journal Critique Assignment Instructions
For each Journal Critique, you will evaluate and critique 1 research article from a professional journal. The journal can be from any discipline that details the current trends in special education leadership. You are highly encouraged to select articles that will help you complete your Journal Analysis Paper. All articles must be current (published within the last 5 years). The assignment must be in current APA format and must include a title page and a reference page; it must also be 225–250 words. The title page, in-text citations, and reference page are NOT included in the word limit.
Journal Critiques consist of 3 parts (each part must be only 1 paragraph): Part 1 – Summary Paragraph, Part 2 – Analysis of Author’s Key Points, and Part 3 – Personal Response. Personal pronouns are appropriate only in the Part 3 – Personal Response section of the Journal Critique.
When composing your reviews, remember to use professional, graduate-level writing. Do not begin with “This article is about…” Instead, open the review with a strong thesis statement and summarize the author’s main points in the first paragraph. Using third person, state your personal reaction to the article in the final paragraph (“This author agrees/disagrees…” or “one can see that…”).
|Levels of Achievement|
|Content 70%||Advanced||Proficient||Developing||Not Present|
|Content||17 to 18 pointsJournal Critique reflects article content and demonstrates thoughts and connections to course material.||15 to 16 pointsJournal Critique reflects article content; however, it may lack connections to course material.||1 to 14 pointsJournal Critique is terse and lacks applied concepts. Content from the article is occasionally missing.||0 pointsJournal Critique does not reflect article content.|
|Understanding of Material||17 to 18 pointsJournal Critique demonstrates understanding of materials and draws on personal experiences.||15 to 16 pointsJournal Critique reflects some understanding of concepts, although statements are occasionally redundant.||1 to 14 pointsJournal Critique demonstrates little understanding of concepts, with many redundant statements.||0 pointsJournal Critique demonstrates a lack of understanding of concepts, with many redundant statements.|
|Readability||16 to 17 pointsJournal Critique is clearly recorded. Understandable conclusions are drawn.||14 to 15 pointsJournal Critique is reasonably neat, but the writing feels rushed.||1 to 13 pointsJournal Critique is hard to understand and does not demonstrate organization and neatness. The writing feels rushed.||0 pointsJournal Critique lacks organization and neatness. The writing is rushed and contains many errors.|
|Structure 30%||Advanced||Proficient||Developing||Not Present|
|Formatting||11 pointsCritique includes a title page and reference page and is written in third person. Critique is in current APA format. Critique is 225–250 words.||9 to 10 pointsCritique includes a title page and reference page but is not in current APA format. Critique is 225–250 words.||1 to 8 pointsCritique is missing either the title page or the reference page and is not in current APA format. Critique is fewer than 225–250 words.||0 pointsCritique is missing both the title page and the reference page and is not in current APA format. Critique is incomplete or missing.|
|Syntax||11 pointsJournal Critique is well-written. Complete sentences are used.||9 to 10 pointsJournal Critique is reasonably well-written. Complete sentences are used.||1 to 8 pointsJournal Critique is not well-written. Complete sentences are not always used. Writing skills are lacking.||0 pointsCritique is not written in complete sentences. Writing skills are lacking.|