+1 (208) 254-6996 [email protected]

Only need help with the results part of paper!! 


Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay




Title of the paper

Your Name

Class & Institutional affiliation


In the abstract you should: (Don’t use bullet points. This is just to list things that should be in your abstract.)

· Identify the article that you have selected from the ‘Articles’ folder on Blackboard

· Paraphrase the abstract of this article

· State in your own words what you think this article is about

· Identify how many experiments this article has (some many only have 1 experiment, and some may have up to 4 different experiments in one paper) and state which experiment (e.g., Experiment 1 or Experiment 2) that you will be analyzing

Keywords: put, some, keywords, or, phrases, that, would, help, others, know, what, your, paper, was, about

Title of the Paper

This section should be your introduction. This section should be AT LEAST ¾ of a page, but no longer than 1 full page, double spaced (Times New Roman – 12 font). Things that you should include:

· Introduce the topic of your paper/the article you chose.

· Provide a brief history of the topic.

· Which article did you select and why; why is this study important to students today? (Don’t use “I”. Instead: The article selected for this analysis is … This study is important today because …)

· What is the research question in this experiment? What are they studying and why?

· If you are using direct citations or direct quotes, make sure to cite your source or it will be plagiarism! (You should have to cite some in this section! Look at the in-text citations section on the Purdue Owl APA link. Once you get to the page, look on the left side tabs.)

(The introduction ends here. Do not go into the Literature Review. That is for next week)

Literature Review

Topic of the First Supporting Article/Study You are Discussing ( Here you will write the topic of the first supporting study that you will be paraphrasing. Below here you will paraphrase it.)

Talk about the first of those other supporting studies here. Do correct APA citation of the article title and the authors. Keep track of this study for your References page that will be due at the end of the semester.

Topic of the Second Supporting Article/Study you are Discussing ( Here you will write the topic of the second supporting study that you will be paraphrasing. Below here you will paraphrase it.)

Talk about the second supporting study here. Do correct APA citation of the article title and the authors. Keep track of this study for your References page that will be due at the end of the semester.

The total of the Literature Review should be at least 1 full double-spaced page. Remember, all your work should be double spaced in Times New Roman, 12 size font, just like this page. (Your Literature Review should look EXACTLY like this page but obviously with your information in place of the current things I have as placeholders.)


In this assignment you will identify participants, instruments/materials, and procedures as a way of explaining how the study in the article was conducted. You should use subheadings, like below. The total of this Methods section should be AT LEAST ¾ of a page long and should look EXACTLY like this. Look at whether words are bold, italicized, if paragraphs are tabbed, everything is double-spaced, etc. Continue to pay attention to the running head title and page number! (You do not need to type anything between the Methods heading and the Participants sub-heading, I just typed here to give you the instructions. Jump straight into the participants!)


Here, you will talk about WHO the participants were. How many participated? Where did they get them from? What were some of the statistics of the participants, ages, sex, education level, etc. etc. Any information that the survey shares about the participants should be paraphrased and cited here.


Here, you will talk about WHAT the researchers used to conduct their study. Did they provide a survey to their participants? Did they test them? Did they interview them? Did they observe them?


Here, you will talk about HOW they did it. Since we now know what instruments/materials they used, what did they do with those instruments? How did they give them to their participants? Was it random? Did they debrief them? Did the participant sign an informed consent to allow the researchers to use their information in the study? How did they get surveys back? DO NOT give results here, just talk about HOW they did it.


In this section you will paraphrase what the results or findings of your article were. Your article should have a section called “Results” or “Findings”. Go there. Read it. Paraphrase it here. By paraphrase it, I mean put it into words that make sense to you. You might see a lot of words or symbols that don’t make any sense to you. Much of it is advanced Psychology or research terms. You should Google search what they mean so that you can put it in your paper in words that make sense to you.

Remember, your paragraphs should be indented, just like the ones here are. Make sure to cite, cite, cite! Please do not use too many direct quotes. If you do, make sure to cite it correctly. Make sure to look at the difference between beginning-of-sentence, end-of-sentence, and quote citations. You can find info. on all of these on the APA website I provided, left side tabs called “In-Text Citations: The Basics” and/or “In-Text Citations: Author/Authors”.

Your Results submission should be at least ½ a page but no more than 1 full page. That is all! You are all starting to do a lot better on these paper sections! I know it was tough at first, but you are all doing well. Keep up the great work!


Review the discussion section in the paper that you are analyzing. Identify:

· Any limitations of the study

· How should future research move forward (which is what you are going to hypothetically do!)…

Follow-up Experiment

In this section, describe how you would extend the research. For example, what questions still remain after analyzing the results of the paper? How would you answer these questions? Develop an additional research question.

Proposed Method

In this section, explain who your participants will be (i.e., who will you use to collect your data in order to answer your research question?). What are your independent variables? dependent variable(s)? How will you conduct your research? (refer back to the method/procedure section in the paper that you analyzed to help clarify how to write this section).

Expected Results

Explain how you would expect your results to turn out (e.g., your hypothesis) and also show these hypothetical results on a graph. For example, if my research question was: does caffeine enhance memory? I would have my independent variable (amount of caffeine—I would have given one group of participants a high dose of caffeine and one group of participants a low dose of caffeine) on the x-axis and my dependent variable (memory performance—I would give both groups the same memory test after their caffeine intake to see which group did better) on my y-axis. If I expected the results to show that caffeine enhanced memory, my graph would look like this:

Overall Discussion

Complete the paper with a conclusion. For example, restate the general topic of the analyzed study. Explain how your follow-up experiment builds on the analyzed study. Why was your research question important? Why did you expect the see the hypothetical results that you demonstrated in your graph? Are there any follow-up research questions that you could have asked concerning this topic?

In your final paragraph, describe how this project has helped your understanding of how research is conducted in the field of psychology.


\High Caffeine Dose 50 Low Caffeine Dose 35


Memory Performance

AmericAn secondAry educAtion 40(1) FAll 2011


Bullying Victims: the eFFects lAst into college


FrAnk d. AdAms, ed.d., is a Professor for the Department of Counseling and Special Education in the School of Education and Counseling at Wayne State College in Wayne, Nebraska.

gloriA J. lAwrence, Ph.d., is a Professor for the Department of Sociology, Psychology and Criminal Justice in the School of Natural & Social Sciences at Wayne State College in Wayne, Nebraska.


This study examined whether those bullied in schools continued to show the effects of being bullied after they enrolled in an institution of higher education. There were 269 undergraduate students participating in the study. Previous studies (2006; 2008) conducted by the authors suggested the effects of bully- ing upon both the victim and bully are long lasting; victims of bullying at the college level indicated histories of being bullied throughout their school years. The results of this study suggest bullying in junior high and/or high school continues into college; the negative effects associated with being victimized or acting as the bully continue into the college years.

The act of bullying, or being bullied, has been viewed as a “rite of pas- sage” (Brown, 2006, para.1); until a violent act occurs to focus attention on bullying, it has generally received little attention from educators. Re- search suggests that, as a result of their experience of being bullied, some victims became bullies themselves. Others performed poorly in their aca- demic work and eventually dropped out of school, and still others chose a more dramatic response to having been bullied, such as committing suicide (Lawrence & Adams, 2006; Olweus, 1978; & Smith, 2011). Various types

AmericAn secondAry educAtion 40(1) FAll 2011


AdAms, lAwrence Bullying Victims: the eFFects lAst into college

and degrees of bullying have been described by Monks and Smith (2010). Monks and Smith reviewed various definitions and rationale for bullying be- haviors. They also examined bullying at various age levels and concluded it exists at all age levels in varying degrees.

Cyberbullying (Rubin, 2008; Strom & Strom, 2005) and workplace bul- lying (Fritzgerald, 2010) are now being more closely examined owing to the widespread and potentially negative effects on the victims. Bullying in the workplace has been examined from the perspective of an “ongoing behav- ior” developed from an educational setting (Smith, Singer, Hoel, & Cooper, 2003). Newman, Holden, and Delville indicated that a history of victimiza- tion was associated with increased levels of stress and avoidant coping strat- egies during the college years. As Oliver and Candappa (2003) suggested, bullies are everywhere; so, too, are the victims.

Problem Statement Do students who have experienced episodes of being bullied in school con- tinue to exhibit characteristics or effects of being bullied after having been enrolled in an institution of higher education?

Review of Current Literature Investigations of the effects of bullying received wide recognition in the 1970s with the work of Olweus (1978) whose studies were triggered by the suicides of several young victims of bullying. Olweus pointed out that the power differences between bully and victim are a crucial com- ponent of the interactions. Parker & Asher (1987) discussed the negative consequences for children bullied in elementary school including middle school adjustment difficulties and the greater likelihood of quitting school. Adams, Lawrence, and Schenck (2008) and Lawrence and Adams (2006) suggested that greater notice has been taken of the presence of bully- ing between the elementary school and the secondary school years. They stressed the “continuous effect” of bullying experienced during the lower grades on the middle school grades and continuing into the secondary school years.

Pellegrini, Bartini and Brooks (1999) examined the occurrence of bul- lying, victimization, and aggressive victimization during early adolescence (5th grade); they reported that bullies were more emotional and physical than their elementary school peers. Bullies sought peer friendships with other aggressive individuals; the friendships existed primarily as a “cover.” Nansel et al. (2001) reported that bullying occurred with greater frequency among middle school-aged youth than among high school-aged youth; mo-

AmericAn secondAry educAtion 40(1) FAll 2011


Bullying Victims: the eFFects lAst into college AdAms, lAwrence

bility of the secondary student was one factor for the reduced number of bullies at that level.

Espelage and Swearer (2003) indicated that bullying at all levels – early elementary, middle, or secondary school – included an ongoing and escalat- ing physical and/or verbal aggression by one or more individuals who seek to attain dominance, status, or property at the various levels. They cited a wide range of bully-victim behaviors or roles: a bully, a victim, a bully-vic- tim, and/or a bystander. The researchers noted the growing presence of fe- male bullies affecting both genders with their aggressive behavior. Tritt and Duncan (1997) indicated that bullied adults, young adults and their victims reported significantly more loneliness than those not involved in bullying situations. They also reported that there were similar levels of lower self- esteem in young adults who were childhood bullies or victims than those not involved in bullying experiences.

The present study was conducted to determine whether those bullied in schools continued to show the effects of being bullied after they entered college. Adams, Lawrence, and Schenck (2008) suggested that the effects of bullying on the victims were long-lasting; the current study investigated whether victims of bullying at the college level have histories of being bul- lied throughout the school years.

The process of bullying is complex, involving many factors. There is no single causal factor for a bully to select one or many victims, but the individuals who are already struggling socially to “fit in” and who appear awkward in various social settings are much more vulnerable to the bully. There is also no single factor for an individual to become a victim.

Method Participants

A total of 269 undergraduate students (56 freshmen, 65 sophomores, 67 juniors, and 81 seniors) at a midwestern state college (total enrollment 3,500) volunteered to participate. Participants were 176 females and 93 males, closely approximating the 2:1 female-to-male distribution of the col- lege student body. Participants’ ages were 19-23 years (n = 240), 24-29 years (n = 20), and 30+ years (n = 9).

Development of the Instrument The questions used for this study were developed from a review of current and relevant journal articles, and reports, as well as information gained from individual discussions held with a variety of ages of individuals (rang- ing from 12 to 47) who identified themselves as having been bullied either

AmericAn secondAry educAtion 40(1) FAll 2011


AdAms, lAwrence Bullying Victims: the eFFects lAst into college

during middle school, secondary school, or college years. None of the indi- viduals involved in these discussions were included in the study. The survey was not normed for use in this study.

Procedure Participants for the study were recruited from randomly selected classes at a rural college; informed consents and questionnaires were distributed by a student assistant to reduce bias and/or implied pressure to participate in the study. A debriefing statement was read after all questionnaires were com- pleted and returned to the assistant. Any questions relating to the survey in- strument were addressed by the student assistants administering the survey.

Participants first signed an informed consent stating a description of the study concerning bullying behaviors at the college level. The informed consent was followed by a self-report questionnaire (See Appendix A.); the questionnaire provided demographics (age, gender, and year in school, etc.), twenty statements on which participants responded using the 5-point Likert scale (5 = strongly agree to 1 = strongly disagree), as well as a section for any additional comments that could be made anonymously.

Findings Scores 5 to 1 were assigned to the responses (5=strongly agree to 1=strongly disagree). The only relationships that failed to reach significance were the relationships between feeling “safe” (Statement 1), feeling “alone and iso- lated” (Statement 4), “threatened with physical harm” (Statement 7), and “individuals laugh at me” (Statement 17) (see Appendix A).

A total of 100 (37.2%) participants reported they had been bullied in high school or junior high school by answering ‘strongly agree’ or ‘agree’ to that statement. They were assigned to the Bullied group. The Non-Bullied group consisted of 160 (59.5%) participants who answered ‘strongly dis- agree’ or ‘disagree.’ Data from nine participants (3.3%) were eliminated from analyses, because they failed to respond to the statement or they an- swered ‘no opinion.’

A one-way ANOVA was conducted on participants’ total scores; an eta squared index for relative treatment magnitude was also performed. Those bullied in high school and/or junior high school scored significantly high- er than those not bullied in high school or junior high school, F (1,258) = 90.51, p<.001 (n2=.35). Cohen (1977) suggested a “large” effect is a value of .15, a “medium” effect is a value of .06, and a “small” effect is a value of .01.

For each question, the percentage of participants who responded ‘agree’ or ‘strongly agree’ was examined. Except for “I feel safe only in my

AmericAn secondAry educAtion 40(1) FAll 2011


Bullying Victims: the eFFects lAst into college AdAms, lAwrence

dorm room,” groups differed significantly on all questions, ts>4.3, ps<.001, r

pb >2.63.

Discussion These data do not support previous data suggesting that bullying decreases as grade level increases to approximately 5% in the 9th grade (Olweus, 1999). In the present study, 37% of participants had been bullied in high school and /or junior high school. The data also suggest that bullying occurs in schools in rural areas; participants of this study were members of a col- lege population in which 65% came from high schools whose senior classes had less than 100 students.

The data suggest that students who are bullied in high school and/or junior high school continue to be victimized (called names, excluded from class activities, physically abused, etc.) in college. Whether a consequence of being bullied in high school, in junior high school, or in college, the victims feel alone and isolated. They find it hard to make friends, and they feel that no one will listen to them while in college. Victims also reported that they do not know how to fight back when individuals say hurtful things to them (Statement 9); they report this to a much greater degree than those not bullied.

The only relationships that failed to reach significance were between feeling safe in their dorm room and feeling alone and isolated, threatened with physical harm, and being laughed at. No significant difference was found between groups on feeling safe only in their dorm room; both groups scored relatively high.

Data from previous studies (Lawrence & Adams, 2006; Adams, Law- rence, & Schenck, 2008) conducted by the researchers indicated that bul- lying continued from early elementary grades through secondary school years. The data from the current study indicate that the effects of bullying continue from the secondary school environments into institutions of higher education. The negative effects of bullying are associated with the charac- teristics of being victimized. The data for this study reflect much of previ- ous research conducted on bullying behavior and characteristics of both bully and victim. The current study builds upon information presented in the various research reports (Lawrence & Adams, 2006; Adams, Lawrence, & Schenck, 2008); there was no attempt to continue or replicate previous research.

The research of Nansel et al. (2001), and Espelage and Swearer (2003) provided a background for the current researchers to identify and describe seven terms reflecting the data from this study. Guided by the work of Nan-

AmericAn secondAry educAtion 40(1) FAll 2011


AdAms, lAwrence Bullying Victims: the eFFects lAst into college

sel et al., and Espelage and Swearer, we use the following terms to describe the characteristics and lasting effects of bullying.

1. safety – being unsure of a secure location within which one may be able to relax, or feel comfortable; the individual’s security has been compromised. Victims only feels safe in their dorm rooms, or a confined space which has a restricted access. They are afraid some- one will say something hurtful, afraid to tell anyone about electronic messages, afraid to go to certain classes, and find few places they feel safe.

2. exclusion – being “left out” of conversations, groupings, or lack a sense of belonging to a group. Victims feel they are often excluded from class or group activities.

3. isolation – feeling a lack of inclusion, or being a member. Victims feel alone and isolated much of the day and feel that no one will listen to them.

4. abuse – receiving negative comments or treated in a disrespectful manner after having expressed behavior and/or conversation deemed inappropriate by an individual or a group. Victims report having been abused for expressing their opinions, having received insulting/ degrading text messages, and being laughed at when responding to questions in class.

5. alienation – feeling or sensing an inability to connect, or communi- cate in a positive manner with other individuals or groups. Victims report it is hard for them to make friends.

6. lonely – feeling that there is no one willing to communicate with one, feeling a sense of having no friend or acquaintance for conversa- tions. Victims feel alone and isolated, feel that no one will believe them, and only wish to sleep.

7. A Rite of Passage – feeling that the action is one which symbolized a growth, or achievement owing to having endured an act of harass- ment. For victims, being bullied is not a “right” of passage.

Conclusions The current study supports conclusions reported by Barker et al. (2008): Youths victimized by their peers were at an increased risk, in turn, of victim- izing others as they move from one environment to another. The Center for Disease Control (2011) reported bullying continues to occur at all levels within the educational environment. This study provides supporting data indicating bullying initiated in middle/senior high school years continues

AmericAn secondAry educAtion 40(1) FAll 2011


Bullying Victims: the eFFects lAst into college AdAms, lAwrence

in other educational settings. The State of Massachusetts reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association (2011) that bullying continues today at various levels within the school years. This study supports that bul- lying continues beyond the school years – into either institutions of higher education or into the workplace.

Exclusion, abuse, alienation, and loneliness reported in this study are poignantly reflected in current legal action taken against a school district that refused to take a positive stand against harassment and bullying (Smith, 2011). The district elected to use a policy of “neutrality.” Smith indicated the message present in an environment of this type is clear – who you are is “not OK;” bullying is permissible throughout the educational environment until “you change”.

With more focus being directed to and from a variety of venues, such as the media (Miller, 2010), academic settings (Rigby, 2010), and the work- place (Oade, 2009), more information and resources are available on bully- ing; however, there is a need for more information examining the long-term effects of the bullying behavior on both the victim and the bully.

References Adams, F. D., Lawrence, G. J., & Schenck, S. (2008, Spring). A survey on bullying: Some

reflections on the findings. NASCD News & Notes, 8, 1-7.

Barker, E. D., Arseneault, L., Brendgen, M., Fontaine, N., & Maughan, B. (2008, Septem- ber). Joint development of bullying and victimization in adolescence: Relations to delinquency and self-harm. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adoles- cent Psychiatry, 47(9), 1030-1038.

Brown, N. L. (2006, December 23). Harassment and bullying: Not a rite of passage. Retrieved from http://www.healthline.com/ blogs/teen_health/2006/12/harassment- and-bullying-not-rite-of.html

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. (2011). Bullying among middle school and high school students – Massachusetts, 2009. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 22(305), 2283-2286.

Cohen, J.M. (1977). Sources of peer group homogeneity. Sociology of Education, 50, 227-241.

Espelage, D. L., & Swearer, S. M. (2003). Research on school bullying and victimization: What have we learned and where do we go from here? School Psychology Review, 32(3), 365-383.

Fritzgerald, B. (2010, August 13). Did UVA administration respond to claims of “work- place bullying”? C-VILLE Charlottesville News & Arts. Retrieved from http://www.c- ville.com/index

Lawrence, G. J., & Adams, F. D. (2006, Fall). For every bully there is a victim. American Secondary Education, 35(1), 66-71.

Miller, T. W. (Ed.). (2010). Handbook of stressful conditions across the lifespan. New York, NY: Springer Publisher.

AmericAn secondAry educAtion 40(1) FAll 2011


Monks, C. P., & Smith, P. K. (2010, December). Definitions of bullying: Age differences in understanding of the term and the role of experience. British Journal of Develop- mental Psychology, 24(4), 801-821.

Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001, April 25). Bullying behaviors among US youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(16), 2094-2100.

Newman, M. L., Holden, G. W., & Delville, Y. (2011, March). Coping with the stress of being bullied: Consequences of coping strategies among college students. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(2), 205-211.

Oade, A. (2009). Managing workplace bullying: How to identify, respond to and manage bullying behavior in the workplace. New York, NY: Palgrave & MacMillan Publish- ers.

Oliver, C., & Candappa, M. (2003). Tackling bullying: Listening to the views of children and young people. Special Report. London, UK: Thomas Coram Research Unit, Institute of Education, Department for Education and Skills.

Olweus, D. O. (1978). Aggression in the schools: Bullies and whipping boys. Washing- ton, DC: Hemisphere Press (Wiley).

Olweus, D. O. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.

Olweus, D. O. (1999). The nature of school bullying (pp. 28-48). In P. K. Smith, Y. Morita, J. Junger-Tas, D. Olweus, R. Cantalano, & P.Slee (Eds). (1999). The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective. Florence, KY: Taylor & Frances/Rout- ledge. xiii, 384 pp.

Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are low- accepted children at risk? Psychological Bulletin, 103, 357-389.

Pellegrini, A. S., Bartini, M., & Brooks, F. (1999). School bullies, victims, and aggressive victims. Factors relating to group affiliation and victimization in early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology,91(2), 216-224.

Rigby, K. (2010). Bullying interventions in schools: Six basic approaches. Victoria, AU: Australian Council for Educational Research Press.

Rubin, R. (2008). ‘Electronic aggression:’ Another form of bullying. USA Today.Com, para. 1.

Smith, K. (2011, July 22). Anoka-Hennepin sued over bullying. Minneapolis Star Tribune. Retrieved from http://www.startribune.com/local/north/125958688.html

Smith, P. K, Singer, M., Hoel, H., & Cooper, C. L. (2003, May). Victimization in the school and the workplace: Are there any links? The British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 175-188.

Strom, P. S., & Strom, R. D. (2005). Cyberbullying by adolescents: A preliminary assess- ment. The Educational Forum, 70, 21-36.

Tritt, C., & Duncan, R. D. (1997, September). The relationship between childhood bul- lying and young adult self-esteem and loneliness. Journal of Humanistic Education and Development, 36(1), 35-44. ERIC Document EJ568410

AdAms, lAwrence Bullying Victims: the eFFects lAst into college

AmericAn secondAry educAtion 40(1) FAll 2011


Bullying Victims: the eFFects lAst into college AdAms, lAwrence

Appendix A Survey Questionnaire 1. I feel safe only in my dorm room.

2. Students in my class call me names, say something hurtful to me, or say something loud enough for me to hear.

3. I am often excluded from class activities.

4. For much of the day I feel alone and isolated.

5. I have been physically abused by someone in my classes, more than once, for expressing my opinion.

6. As I walk to and from class, I am afraid someone will say something hurtful to me.

7. I have been threatened with physical harm this week.

8. I have received more than one email which had insulting comments about me.

9. I don’t know how to fight back when individuals say hurtful things to me, or about me.

10. I have received more than one text message that was insulting and degrading to me.

11. I am afraid to tell anyone about being hurt or harmed from emails, text messages, or instant messages.

12. No one believes me about being hurt, insulted, or harmed from emails or instant messages.

13. I am afraid to go to certain classes because of individuals present in those classes.

14. I experienced acts of bullying during my years in high school and/or junior high school.

AmericAn secondAry educAtion 40(1) FAll 2011


AdAms, lAwrence Bullying Victims: the eFFects lAst into college

15. During the day, or in my classes, I only wish to sleep.

16. I find that I have great difficulty concentrating in class because of cer- tain individuals in that class.

17. When I respond to an instructor’s question, there is always laughter from individuals in the class.

18. It is hard for me to make friends.

19. No one will listen to me; I feel so alone and isolated.

20. There are few places in the school where I feel safe.

The questions were developed by the researchers from a review of rel- evant journal articles and reports as well as information gained from dis- cussions held with individuals who identified themselves as having been bullied and not participating in the current study during middle school, sec- ondary school, or college years.

The survey was not normed for this study.

Copyright of American Secondary Education is the property of American Secondary Education and its content

may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder’s express

written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.

Order your essay today and save 10% with the discount code ESSAYHELP