+1 (208) 254-6996 [email protected]
  

I have attached the previous weeks assignment with the rubric.

ENG 122 Summative Assessment Part One Guidelines and Rubric Feedback and Revision Reflection

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Summative Assignment
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Overview: In this module, you learned about some different strategies for revising your writing. In this assignment, you will review your instructor’s feedback on your writing plan and consider how you will incorporate that feedback to further develop your thoughts as you prepare to write your first draft of the critical analysis essay. Prompt: For this reflection assignment, you will make some choices about your approach to your critical analysis essay based on your understanding of revision and the feedback on your writing plan provided by your instructor. You’ll also discuss who your intended audience is and what you hope to accomplish with your essay. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed in at least two paragraphs (each paragraph should contain at least five sentences in order to adequately address each element):

I. Feedback and Revision Reflection: Use this reflection to gather your thoughts and determine a strategy for writing your critical analysis essay based on your instructor’s feedback on your writing plan.

A. Think about your experiences with revision in the past. What approaches to revision have worked well for you? [ENG-122-03] B. What revision strategy from the Module Five content would you like to try when revising your critical analysis essay? [ENG-122-03] C. Review your writing plan and the feedback provided by your instructor. How does this feedback influence your ideas about your selected

reading? [ENG-122-03] D. What changes will you make to your analysis now that you have received this outside feedback? [ENG-122-03]

II. Audience: Use this part of your reflection to consider your audience and purpose. A. Imagine that your essay will be read by an audience beyond your instructor. Identify an audience that might benefit from reading your essay and

describe some of this audience’s characteristics. [ENG-122-01] B. What potential challenges could you have connecting with this audience with your writing? [ENG-122-01]

C. Identify some choices you can make within your writing to connect with this audience. [ENG-122-01]

Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Save your work in a Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Then, check your writing for errors. Once you have proofread your document, submit it via the Summative Assessment Part One: Feedback and Revision Reflection link in Brightspace

Critical Elements Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Value

Feedback and Revision

Reflection: Approaches to

Revision [ENG-122-03]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and cites specific, relevant examples of successful approaches (100%)

Describes previous approaches to revisions (85%)

Describes previous approaches to revisions, but response is unclear or cursory (55%)

Does not describe previous approaches to revisions (0%)

11.25

Feedback and Revision

Reflection: Revision Strategy

[ENG-122-03]

Identifies a new revision strategy to implement based on the Module Five content (100%)

Identifies a new revision strategy to implement based on the Module Five content, but response is unclear or cursory (55%)

Does not identify a new revision strategy to implement based on the Module Five content (0%)

11.25

Feedback and Revision

Reflection: Influence

[ENG-122-03]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and explanation demonstrates considerable thought and contemplation of the feedback (100%)

Explains how the feedback from the instructor influenced ideas about the selected reading (85%)

Explains how the feedback from the instructor influenced ideas about the selected reading, but response is unclear or cursory (55%)

Does not explain how the feedback from the instructor influenced ideas about the selected reading (0%)

11.25

Feedback and Revision

Reflection: Changes

[ENG-122-03]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and cites specific, relevant examples in support of the explanation (100%)

Explains how the instructor’s feedback changes the analysis (85%)

Explains how the instructor’s feedback changes the analysis, but response is unclear or cursory (55%)

Does not explain how the instructor’s feedback changes the analysis (0%)

11.25

Audience: Audience

Characteristics [ENG-122-01]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of the audience’s characteristics (100%)

Identifies the essay’s audience and describes characteristics of this audience (85%)

Identifies the essay’s audience, but response is unclear, cursory, or characteristics of the audience is inaccurate (55%)

Does not identify the essay’s audience (0%)

15

Audience: Challenges

[ENG-122-01]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of the challenges connecting with the audience (100%)

Identifies potential challenges in connecting with the intended audience (85%)

Identifies possible challenges in connecting with the intended audience but response is unclear or cursory (55%)

Does not identify potential challenges in connecting with the intended audience (0%)

15

Critical Elements Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Value

Audience: Choices [ENG-122-01]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides an insightful connection between the challenges posed and strategies necessary to connect with the audience (100%)

Identifies choices that could be made within the essay to connect with the intended audience (85%)

Identifies choices that could be made within the essay to connect with the intended audience, but response is unclear or cursory (55%)

Does not identify choices that could be made within the essay (0%)

15

Articulation of Response

Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format (100%)

Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization (85%)

Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas (55%)

Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas (0%)

10

Total 100%

3

Summary of ‘Mother Tongue

Michael Priebe

Southern New Hampshire University

Prof Bacho

ENG-122

1

09/23/2021

Summary of ‘Mother Tongue’

Amy Tan, in her short story ‘Mother Tongue’, seeks to examine how the use of language varies according to contexts. She writes that whenever she is conversing with her mother she uses a different kind of English, compared to the one she uses when she is delivering a speech. She proposes the idea that the kind of English used at her home had an impact on her studies. She observes that most Asian Americans are more inclined to science-related careers due to their language limit. In the case of her mother, the limit of language hinders her from getting the services that she needs to get. Amy Tan, however, rises above the language limit by exploring and using the ‘broken’ or ‘limited’ English. She triumphs when her mother tells her that it is easy to read (Tan, Amy.2016)

References

Tan, Amy. 2016, “Mother Tongue.” The Norton Field Guide to Writing. 4th ed., W. W. Norton, pp.

Order your essay today and save 10% with the discount code ESSAYHELP