+1 (208) 254-6996 [email protected]
  

 Change is never an easy process. For years, researchers and theorists have attempted to develop frameworks for change to help individuals accept the need for change. Consider the scenario below about change in a large organization. Then, answer the associated questions related to organizational change.Due to the impact of COVID-19, a large manufacturing company recognizes that organizational culture changes are necessary. Furthermore, process related changes must occur. The organization has experienced a decline in sales from early 2020 to present and recognizes that if changes are not made, many issues may arise. Reham, the CEO of the company, recognizes that organizational changes are needed.Reham has proposed that the company reduce the size of the workforce by 20% until sales increase. The organization currently employs many full-time manufacturing employees, but only employs a handful of office workers. To further market the products provided by the company, many office workers are working 10-20 hours of overtime, per week, to assist with marketing efforts. Needless to say, office personnel are very overwhelmed with tasks and responsibilities.At a three-hour meeting, Reham noted that a 20% reduction among manufacturing employees would be made within the next month. She then went on to state that three new positions would be added to the home office to ensure that the workload was not as intense for office personnel.During the meeting, many individuals recognized Reham’s point and said that they would support her decision to make these workforce changes. Unfortunately, Reham’s colleague, Alan (the Director of Manufacturing), became furious about this change and mentioned that he did not understand why Reham was trying to ruin the company’s culture.Based on the scenario above, answer the following questions:

  1. Why do you believe that Alan is having a difficult time recognizing the change proposed by Reham?
  2. What are the implications associated with Alan, the Director of Manufacturing, not supporting this change initiative?
  3. Although Reham is the CEO, and has ultimate authority, how might obtaining additional feedback from other organizational leaders assist Alan in further understanding the rationale for this change?
  4. Before Reham pushes this change forward, what short-term and long-term impacts should she consider?

Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Managing Dynamic Module 5
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay
  • Be 5 pages in length, which does not include the title and reference pages, which are never a part of the content minimum requirements.
  • Use  APA style guidelines.
  • you should met all the requirement in the question plus the guide that attachment 

MGT521 Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 05

Exceeds Expectation

Meets Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence

Content, Research, and Analysis

21-25 Points 16-20 Points 11-15 Points 6-10 Points

Requirements Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

21-25 Points 16-20 Points 11-15 Points 6-10 Points

Content Demonstrates substantial and extensive knowledge of the materials, with no errors or major omissions.

Demonstrates adequate knowledge of the materials; may include some minor errors or omissions.

Demonstrates fair knowledge of the materials and/or includes some major errors or omissions.

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials and/or includes many major errors or omissions.

25-30 Points 19-24 Points 13-18 Points 7-12 Points

Analysis Provides strong thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications.

Provides adequate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications.

Provides poor though, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications.

Provides little or no thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications.

13-15 Points 10-12 Points 7-9 Points 4-6 Points

Sources Sources go above and beyond required criteria and are well chosen to provide effective substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Sources meet required criteria and are adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Sources meet required criteria but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Source selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

Mechanics and Writing

5 Points 4 Points 3 Points 1-2 Points

Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure, contains no errors in grammar, spelling,

Project is fairly well organized and written and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure, may include a few

Project is poorly organized and written and may not follow proper format as outlined in the assignment. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development,

Project is not organized or well written and is not in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar, spelling, APA style,

MGT521 Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 05

APA style, or APA citations and references.

minor errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references.

and/or includes numerous or major errors in grammar, spelling, APA style or APA citations and references.

and APA citations and references.

Total points possible = 100

Order your essay today and save 10% with the discount code ESSAYHELP