+1 (208) 254-6996 [email protected]
  

Evolutionary Personality Theory

Evolutionary psychologists assert that human beings extend help based on an intuitive cost-benefit analysis and only risk resources when the expected benefit outweighs the cost of the action. One outcome of this is that we are more likely to help those to whom we are related instead of those to whom we are not related.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Week 4 Discussion
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Based on your reading about evolutionary and existential approaches, answer the following:

  • 1. Explain the above proposition given by evolutionary psychologists in your own words. You can be specific by identifying a time when you helped someone or chose not to help someone.
  • 2. Clearly express a cost-benefit analysis you did in both the cases.

Natural and sexual selection has shaped the innate, human experience. But they also assert that as humans, we are only predisposed to act in certain ways under specific conditions and that we are not just instinctive creatures.

  • 3.Imagine yourself an evolutionary psychologist, how would you explain murder or suicide? Use terminology specific to evolutionary personality theory.

According to evolutionary personality theory, men and women experience jealousy for different reasons. Males experience jealousy when they know or suspect that their mates are sexually unfaithful. Females experience jealousy when they know or suspect that the resources provided to her and her offspring by her mate are threatened by a rival.

  • 4.Discuss the evolutionary personality theory proposed by evolutionary psychologists in terms of how it explains jealousy? Explain why you think your experience conforms or does not conform to the theory.
  • 5. Some people find the evolutionary personality theory offensive or have strong opinions against it. What are your views about the theory? Explain.

no plagerism-Cite your sources in APA format. only need one page this is a discussion post and just answer 5 questions

[[title]][[label]] [[_statusText]] [[_getCriterionContext(criterionName)]] [[_localizeOutOf(entity, _score)]] * [[_localizeStarLabel(totalScore)]] [[localize(‘rubricSummaryA11y’)]] [[entity.properties.name]] [[level.properties.name]] [[localize(‘criterionScore’)]] [[_getLoaHeadingLangTerm()]] [[loaLevel.properties.name]] [[criterion.properties.name]] [[_name]]

[[_name]]

[[localize(‘overallScore’)]]

[[localize(‘overallScore’)]][[_getLevelName(level, _version)]] [[_localizePoints(level)]] [[_getDescriptionText(level)]] [[item.alertMessage]]

[[localize(‘overallFeedback’)]]

Rubric Assessment

Rubric Total Score Total Score of SUO Discussion Rubric (80 Points) – Version 1.2, / 80 * This table lists criteria and criteria group names in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. You can give feedback on each criterion by tabbing to the add feedback buttons in the table. Response No Submission 0 points Emerging (F-D: 1-27) 27 points Satisfactory (C: 28-31) 31 points Proficient (B: 32-35) 35 points Exemplary (A: 36-40) 40 points Criterion Score Quality of Initial Posting

No initial posting exists to evaluate.

The information provided is inaccurate, not focused on the assignment’s topic, and/or does not answer the question(s) fully. Response demonstrates incomplete understanding of the topic and/or inadequate preparation.

The information provided is accurate, giving a basic understanding of the topic(s) covered. A basic understanding is when you are able to describe the terms and concepts covered. Despite this basic understanding, initial posting may not include complete development of all aspects of the assignment.

The information provided is accurate, displaying a good understanding of the topic(s) covered. A good understanding is when you are able to explain the terms and topics covered. Initial posting demonstrates sincere reflection and addresses most aspects of the assignment, although all concepts may not be fully developed.

The information provided is accurate, providing an in-depth, well thought-out understanding of the topic(s) covered. An in-depth understanding provides an analysis of the information, synthesizing what is learned from the course/assigned readings.Score of Quality of Initial Posting, / 40 * This table lists criteria and criteria group names in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. You can give feedback on each criterion by tabbing to the add feedback buttons in the table. Participation No Submission 0 points Emerging (F-D: 1-13) 13 points Satisfactory (C: 14-16) 16 points Proficient (B: 17-18) 18 points Exemplary (A: 19-20) 20 points Criterion Score Participation in Discussion

No responses to other classmates were posted in this discussion forum.

May include one or more of the following: *Comments to only one other student’s post. *Comments are not substantive, such as just one line or saying, “Good job” or “I agree. *Comments are off topic.

Comments to two or more classmates’ initial posts but only on one day of the week. Comments are substantive, meaning they reflect and expand on what the other student wrote.

Comments to two or more classmates’ initial posts on more than one day. Comments are substantive, meaning they reflect and expand on what the other student wrote.

Comments to two or more classmates’ initial posts and to the instructor’s comment (if applicable) on two or more days. Responses demonstrate an analysis of peers’ comments, building on previous posts. Comments extend and deepen meaningful conversation and may include a follow-up question.Score of Participation in Discussion, / 20 * This table lists criteria and criteria group names in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. You can give feedback on each criterion by tabbing to the add feedback buttons in the table. Writing No Submission 0 points Emerging (F-D: 1-13) 13 points Satisfaction (C: 14-16) 16 points Proficient (B: 17-18) 18 points Exemplary (A: 19-20) 20 points Criterion Score Writing Mechanics (Spelling, Grammar, Citation Style) and Information Literacy

No postings for which to evaluate language and grammar exist.

Numerous issues in any of the following: grammar, mechanics, spelling, use of slang, and incomplete or missing citations and references. If required for the assignment, did not use course, text, and/or outside readings (where relevant) to support work.

Some spelling, grammatical, and/or structural errors are present. Some errors in formatting citations and references are present. If required for the assignment, utilizes sources to support work for initial post but not comments to other students. Sources include course/text readings but outside sources (when relevant) include non-academic/authoritative, such as Wikis and .com resources.

Minor errors in grammar, mechanics, or spelling in the initial posting are present. Minor errors in formatting citations and references may exist. If required for the assignment, utilizes sources to support work for both the initial post and some of the comments to other students. Sources include course and text readings as well as outside sources (when relevant) that are academic and authoritative (e.g., journal articles, other text books, .gov Web sites, professional organization Web sites, cases, statutes, or administrative rules).

Minor to no errors exist in grammar, mechanics, or spelling in both the initial post and comments to others. Formatting of citations and references is correct. If required for the assignment, utilizes sources to support work for both the initial post and the comments to other students. Sources include course and text readings as well as outside sources (when relevant) that are academic and authoritative (e.g., journal articles, other text books, .gov Web sites, professional organization Web sites, cases, statutes, or administrative rules).Score of Writing Mechanics (Spelling, Grammar, Citation Style) and Information Literacy, / 20 *

Overall Score

Overall Score

No Submission0 points minimumThere was no submission for this assignment.

Emerging (F to D Range)1 point minimumSatisfactory progress has not been met on the competencies for this assignment.

Satisfactory (C Range)56 points minimumSatisfactory progress has been achieved on the competencies for this assignment.

Proficient (B Range)64 points minimumProficiency has been achieved on the competencies for this assignment.

Exemplary (A Range)72 points minimumThe competencies for this assignment have been mastered.Close

Order your essay today and save 10% with the discount code ESSAYHELP