+1 (208) 254-6996 [email protected]
  

Question uploaded

Evolution of Leadership Theories

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Essay
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

In 700-800 words, do the following:

1.Briefly outline the evolution of theories on leadership.

2. Describe how one theory led to the next.

3. Explain how the practical application of leadership styles have changed because of this evolution.

4. Identify current issues in applying leadership theory.

*Instructions*

*Use 4 scholarly references

* References with Permalink a Most

*No Dot Com

*Prepare this assignment in the APA Style Guide.

*Plagiarism Free

* Use the Rubric This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Rubic_Print_Format

Course CodeClass CodeAssignment TitleTotal Points
Evolution of Leadership Theories
CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less than Satisfactory (74.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (87.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints Earned
Content70.0%
Briefly outline the evolution of theories on leadership. Describe how one theory led to the next.30.0%Essay ignores major components of the assignment. The evolution of theories on leadership is not outlined and how one theory led to the next is not described.Essay outlines the evolution of theories on leadership in a less than satisfactory manner; no evidence is provided to support explanation. How one theory led to the next is not fully described. Demonstrates poor understanding of topic.Essay minimally outlines the evolution of theories on leadership with little evidence; explanation is limited and lacks relevant evidence to support claims. . How one theory led to the next is minimally addressed. Demonstrates a minimal understanding of the topic.Essay adequately outlines the evolution of theories on leadership with some details and evidence; explanation is good with some evidence to support claims. . How one theory led to the next is adequately addressed. Demonstrates a correct understanding of the topic.Essay comprehensively outlines the evolution of theories on leadership with accurate details and factual evidence; explanation is thorough and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. . How one theory led to the next is comprehensively addressed. Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of topic.
Explain how the practical application of leadership styles have changed because of this evolution.20.0%Essay ignores major components of the assignment. How the practical application of leadership styles have changed because of this evolution is not explained.Essay explains how the practical application of leadership styles have changed because of this evolution in a less than satisfactory manner; no evidence is provided to support explanation. Demonstrates poor understanding of topic.Essay minimally explains how the practical application of leadership styles have changed because of this evolution with little evidence; explanation is limited and lacks relevant evidence to support claims. Demonstrates a minimal understanding of the topic.Essay adequately explains how the practical application of leadership styles have changed because of this evolution with some details and evidence; explanation is good with some evidence to support claims. Demonstrates a correct understanding of the topic.Essay comprehensively how the practical application of leadership styles have changed because of this evolution with accurate details and factual evidence; explanation is thorough and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of topic.
Identify current issues in applying leadership theory.20.0%Essay does not identify the current issues in applying leadership theory.Essay identifies current issues in applying leadership theory is less than satisfactory; no evidence is provided to support explanation. Demonstrates poor understanding of topic.Essay minimally identifies current issues in applying leadership theory with little evidence; explanation is limited and lacks relevant evidence to support claims. Demonstrates a minimal understanding of the topic.Essay adequately identifies current issues in applying leadership theory with some details and evidence; explanation is good with some evidence to support claims. Demonstrates a correct understanding of the topic.Essay comprehensively identifies current issues in applying leadership theory with accurate details and factual evidence; explanation is thorough and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of topic.
Organization and Effectiveness20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose7.0%Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction8.0%Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)5.0%Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format10.0%
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)5.0%Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)5.0%Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage100%

Order your essay today and save 10% with the discount code ESSAYHELP