+1 (208) 254-6996 [email protected]

  500 words

Accountability and ethical conduct are important concepts in public administration. In Tennessee, recent political stakeholders and some bureaucratic stakeholders have been caught up in various scandals (Operation Tennessee Waltz, Operation Rocky Top, etc.). Based on the readings, what could Tennessee do to make political and bureaucratic functionaries more accountable?

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

 For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 1 scholarly citation in APA format. Each reply must incorporate at least 1 scholarly citation in APA format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include the textbook, the Bible, etc. 

UNIT 7 Presentations

Welcome to the unit 7 presentation for p a t m 501 in this week’s video we will continue supporting our topic of information technology and decision making for this week’s presentation will focus on information technology decision making a Christian worldview and concluding remarks look around and you can see evidence nearly daily of the growing importance of information technology in our everyday lives for example you’re watching this presentation through the use of information technology likely a computer and internet access in today’s public or private workplaces we use information technology to be effective efficient and provide goods and services if formation technology is changing the face of the workplace by allowing for facilitation of communication increased coronation and faster decision making if a motion is used to support decision making in response to a problem a problem can be defined as a difference between an actual and a desired end state problem solving is described as a den of finding a solution to allow one to transition from an actual to a desired end state subsequently a decision is a choice between various courses of action or decision support systems or d.s.s. or information technology systems that allow for people to interact and analyze large elements of data for solving complex problems managers will often approached decision making and one of 3 ways problem avoiders are enacted in decision making process problem solvers gather information and solve the problems problem seekers anticipate problems prior to their occurrence decision making is traditionally comprised of 5 steps the quality of the decision will be largely dependent upon the information that the leader has to make the decision step one to get done if I the problem step to develop and evaluate solutions to the problem step 3 choose a solution. Step 4 implement the solution and Step 5 evaluate the results in emergency planning one of the phases of planning is called information analysis and information analysis is used to determine what the current situation is and determine what the desired end state should be courses of action are developed to provide senior leadership with options for achieving a desired end state senior leader select a course of action or make a decision to assist in cheating the desired end state for example when planning for the delivery of water to a disaster location and information Alice assist conducted to determine how much water is needed in the community and how the water will get to the location if there is not enough water in the community the emergency manager may need to get water through mutual aid resources or purchase the resources from a vendor to mutual aid resources can be delivered quickly and will not cost very much money the vendor may be delayed in getting the water to the community and will cost double the amount of the money these 2 courses of action presented to senior leadership for consideration senior leadership makes the decision to use my choice resources to provide water in the community making it Biblically based decision begins by understanding the will of God free choices and sharing his will with those that are eager to follow him according to keep the 7 step biblical decision making processes as follows step one Pray step 2 obey God’s word Step 3 apply biblical principles Step 4 surrender to God’s will step 5 Seek godly counsel Step 6 stretch your faith in Step 7 desires of your heart. Applying biblical decision making steps to the decision making process we discussed in the previous slide helps to guide you towards making a biblical based decision that will please the Lord 1st and foremost you must pray about the decision at hand ask the Lord to give you the knowledge and wisdom to make the decision that will glorify Him Our attitude towards decision making should not be that of Jesus Himself who affirm not my will but yours be done Luke $2242.00 the process of decision making includes making a judgment about an editor action decisions are an act of the will and they are always influenced by the mind the emotions or both the decisions we make actually reflect the desires of our heart I would like to share with you a verse from Proverbs $2712.00 a prudent person for Cease it dangerous ahead and takes precautions the simpleton goes blindly on and suffer so consequences I leave with you the following question for the week before making a decision are you making that decision today are you looking to please yourself or are you pleasing the Lord.


PADM 501

Discussion Assignment Grading Rubric

CriteriaLevels of Achievement
Content 70%AdvancedProficientDevelopingNot present
Thread:Content9 to 10 pointsThe thread has a clear, logical flow. Major Points: are stated clearly and are supported by reading and study materials, pertinent examples, thoughtful analysis, and integration of biblical principles.All key components of the Discussion Board Forum prompt are addressed in the thread.7 to 8 pointsThe thread has a logical flow. Major Points: are stated reasonably well and are generally supported by reading and study materials, pertinent examples, thoughtful analysis and integration of biblical principles.1 to 6 pointsThe thread lacks flow or content. Major Points: are unclear or confusing. Major Points: are not sufficiently supported.0 points Not present
Reply: Content6 to 7 pointsReply moves the conversation forward with new research and ideas.4 to 5 pointsReply generally moves the conversation forward with new research and ideas.1to 3 pointsReply often fails to move the conversation forward with new research and ideas.0 pointsNot present
Structure 30%AdvancedProficientDevelopingNot present
Composition and Formatting3 to 4 pointsSpelling and grammar are correct. Sentences are complete, clear, and concise.Paragraphs contain appropriately varied sentence structures. Where applicable, references are cited in current APA format.2 to 2 pointsSome errors in grammar, punctuation and/or spelling are present. Some sentences may require clarification. Paragraphs contain some varied sentence structures. Where applicable, references are cited with some APA formatting.1 to 1 pointSpelling, grammar, and punctuation errors distract. Sentences are incomplete or unclear. Paragraphs are poorly formed. Where applicable, references are minimally or not cited in current APA format.0 pointsNot Present
Word Count3 to 4 pointsRequired word count of at least 300 words is met for the thread.Minimum word count of 150 words for the reply is met.2 to 2 pointsWord count is 200-299 words for the thread.Minimum word count of 100-149 words for the reply is met.1 to 1 pointWord count is 1 to 199 words for the thread.Minimum word count of 1-99 words for the reply is met.0 pointsNot Present

Order your essay today and save 10% with the discount code ESSAYHELP