+1 (208) 254-6996 essayswallet@gmail.com
  

In a hostage crisis, is it ethical for a government to agree to grant a terrorist immunity if he releases the hostages, even though the government has every intention of capturing and prosecuting the terrorist once his hostages are released? 

Need 400 words for the above question including references and everything is in APA format.

Also we need to respond to 2 of my colleague posts. So need 2 responses. Each response should contain 200 words.

Attached are the colleague posts.

Terrorist taking and kidnapping the hostage has become an international concern in nowadays. According to the recent statistics they are nearly 2000 hostages are taken during the last 10 years. Hostages taking, and kidnapping can happen anytime or anywhere in the place. The main issue is the important developments in the war on terrorism. In any case, there has been minimal criminal justice research on this developing concern. One explanation for this lack of study can be clarified by the shortage of important information on terrorist hostage-taking and kidnapping.

Different particular contextual analyses are additionally a part of hostage-taking and kidnapping studies. This classification tends to take a particular instance of hostage-taking and kidnapping by incidence. This has specific legitimacy since it gives a subjective comprehension of the elements of hostage-taking/seizing. Accordingly, with different areas of terrorism, it is sensible to expect a parallel development of terrorist hostage-taking and kidnapping. Nevertheless, past examinations neglected to get a handle on the critical change in light of the fact that a larger part of studies was conducted before September 11th. Data is utilized in this study is a bit of the database on terrorism incidents overall gathered by the Institute for the Study of Violent Groups (ISVG). The information has been gathered altogether from open sources, which are characterized as data that isn’t esteemed arranged or confined and are promptly available without the requirement for an exceptional status from a governmental organization. The information gathered here come from thirteen particular specific categories of sources: books, communications like broadcasts, court documents, datasets, FBIS2 (Foreign Broadcasting Information System), governmental reports, Journals. First, religion can be a vital predicting factor for the result of a hostage-taking and kidnapping incident. According to White (2003), religious impacted terrorists will probably murder their victims. In this specific situation, when hostage-takers are strongly affected by religious fanaticism, they will probably execute their hostage than non-religious prisoner takers. They might need to punish non-believers or traitors or eliminate individual seen as evil.

References

 Scott, C. V. (2000). Bound for glory: The hostage crisis as a captivity narrative in Iran. International Studies Quarterly, 44(1), 177. Retrieved from http://0-eds.a.ebscohost.com.library.acaweb.org/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=5&sid=2c4a55fc-920d-4b03-9fa8-92b8ad2d5721%40sessionmgr4008

Russell, B. (2008). Taken Hostage: The Iranian Hostage Crisis and America’s First Encounter With Radical Islam David Farber. The Historian, (2), 308. Retrieved from http://0-eds.a.ebscohost.com.library.acaweb.org/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=7&sid=2c4a55fc-920d-4b03-9fa8-92b8ad2d5721%40sessionmgr4008

Yes, in a hostage crisis it is ethical for a government to agree to grant a terrorist immunity if he releases the hostages. This is because It is the duty of the government to provide and save each citizen of its country. Even though the government has every intention of capturing and prosecuting the terrorists once his hostages are released, it’s a priority is to avoid any danger to the normal citizens and to save their lives. It happened in many countries all over the world many times. Even though the government grants a terrorist immunity to release the hostages later, it goes on with missions to capture those terrorists, (Bovard, J. 2004). 

It protects and secures diplomats who take security together with other countries and the laws of the country where they are visited. Diplomatic relations provide security for Ambassadors and Diplomats to perform their duties without fear of being disturbed by the host country.

Failure of immunity may also arise in the case of Iran’s hostage crisis, where it protects different properties and violates the obligation of the diplomatic immunity of the revoked personnel. In the hostage crisis, the terrorist wants immunity for the release of the hostages and the government has to negotiate under these circumstances. It will be part of the government even if it wants to be timeless and related terrorists continue to be indefinite Care must be made and when the terrorists are involved, the lives of the people in the game are involved. Dependent and terrorist requirements are generally fulfilled by the Government. Several agreements adopted by the United Nations General Assembly refer to terrorism as a threat, such as hostage-taking, terrorist bombing, terrorist group financing, and nuclear terrorism. However, international condemnation of an activity does not automatically imply just cogent status. 1994 The United Nations Declaration on the Prevention of Terrorism Measures points to the need to promote “progressive development and coding of international law” and it is a situation that indicates that terrorism will be taken out of the just cogent. ( Vecchi, Van Hasselt, & Romano .2005). This would spare numerous lives from potential dangers. There are numerous progressions and confinements in the field of emergency negotiation.

                                                                           References:

Vecchi, G., Van Hasselt, B., Romano, J. (July 2005). Crisis (hostage) negotiation: current strategies and issues in high-risk conflict resolution. Aggression & Violent Behavior.

Bovard, J. (2004). Terrorism and Tyranny: Trampling Freedom, Justice, and Peace to Rid the World of Evil. Palgrave Macmillan.